BEWARE – MYTHS and NONSENSE
Debunking a Foolishly Flawed Crime Escape Scheme
Winston Moseley attacked and stabbed 24-year-old Kitty Genovese at 3 a.m. on the street near her Kew Gardens home in Queens NY on 11 March 1964. Her screams prompted one neighbor to shout out, causing Moseley to flee, but he soon returned to rape the helpless, bleeding woman. Her subsequent screams throughout the 30-minute ordeal fell on the deaf ears of 38 of her neighbors. Moseley then stabbed her to death. Other than the one neighbor who’d shouted just once, 37 of the "bystanders" had not tried to help her or even call the police.
At least that's basically what the news media reported (though years later disputed as wildly inaccurate - see the end of this page). A worldwide news media furor erupted over the neighbors' supposed apathy - and the neighbors supposedly refused to explain their baffling behavior.
Sprouting from this messy morass of publicity, a woefully unqualified newspaper editor concocted a cockamamie escape scheme to counter such "apathy" in the future. He proposed that outdoor crime victims should yell, “Fire!” instead of “Help! Police!”
Supposedly, apathetic neighbors would then fear a fire spreading to their
homes and call the fire department, and then the fire trucks' sirens would scare
away the attacker. Hmm... that's like the old Rube Goldberg cartoons of building a wildly elaborate contraption to perform a simple task. But since it came from a major newspaper, few questioned its supposed wisdom.
Though never tested for feasibility, this goofy notion somehow grew into “folk wisdom” still taught today by many “crime experts” - even retired FBI agents and cops (they, too, sometimes just repeat poorly-conceived “conventional wisdom”). This supposed emergency tactic had escaped any serious scrutiny of its logic – or lack thereof – for decades. But, finally, researchers have investigated more deeply.
A tiny number of times, yelling “Fire” has even been reported as successfully deterring a crime. Not because it’s a clever strategy, but because whatever help it had summoned would’ve been forthcoming with any screamed plea – regardless of its wording (such as “Stop!” or “Let go of me!” or “No!” or Help!). Most bystanders are not apathetic and will at least start hollering, turning on porch lights, honking car horns, and so on – and of course, calling the police (NOT firefighters). Most predators almost always prefer secrecy/anonymity, so any attention from bystanders/witnesses usually scares them off.
Besides, what if the victim is nowhere near buildings or anything that might catch fire? Yelling “Fire!” – during a violent crime with NO visible fire – is absurd.
Finally, bluffs are always risky in any situation, but trying to bluff bystanders into saving your life is beyond foolish. Trying to manipulate them with a fictitious fire when you really want to be rescued from a crime adds dangerous confusion to a crisis. Bystanders have reported that when they couldn’t see a fire anywhere, they assumed the woman yelling “Fire!” was goofing around, crazy, or drunkenly fighting with her “boyfriend” – and they ignored her after all.
Why risk confusing your potential rescuers when you're in deep trouble? A life-threatening emergency is not the time to gamble on some silly trick. Instead, you should accurately identify your plight by yelling “Help! Police!”
And here's another reason why:
Many Hollywood movies have shown an officer commanding a firing squad. He yells, “Ready. Aim. FIRE!” – and his troops shoot at the target. In other movies, a commander just yells “FIRE!” Most people are very familiar with that command. So, think about it … especially if a predator is pointing a gun at you in a tense, life-or-death situation, you do NOT want to yell “FIRE!” Doh! It's not a good idea to confuse an excited gunman when your life is at stake. See Victim's Options: Overview
Alone, a single bystander may or may not intervene to rescue a stranger – depending upon many factors, such as the degree of risk involved, individual ability, etc. But most people will at least phone the police.
With several bystanders, additional factors come into play, such as how well they know each other as well as the shame they’d feel by not acting – by at least calling the police and/or creating a loud ruckus (perhaps from a safe distance) to deter the criminal.
Furthermore, in “The Tipping Point: How Little Things Can Make a Big Difference,” Malcolm Gladwell wrote that psychologists Bibb Latane of Columbia University and John Darley of NYU studied the Bystander Apathy in the Kitty Genovese case (a.k.a. the "Genovese Syndrome") and found that what most affected “helping behavior” was how many people witness an event.
The larger the group, the more each person’s responsibility is diffused. Each thinks others will help, or if no one is helping, then there isn’t really a problem (or solution). They aren’t heartless, they just feel less responsibility to act. Ironically, Latane and Darley say, had Kitty Genovese been attacked with just one bystander nearby, she might have been rescued.
Years later, another researcher claimed to have found yet another reason for the neighbors' apathy. Supposedly, Kitty Genovese had a neighborhood reputation for sexual promiscuity. On 11 March 2004, the 40th anniversary of Genovese’ death, Dr. Tina Trent wrote in the Atlanta Journal Constitution, “Although the ‘38 Witnesses’ were in their homes, not a courtroom, they judged the victim, not her attacker, and they sentenced her to death.”
Dr. Trent's blaming of the neighbors' self-righteous moral disdain was later debunked. See the link in Update 2016 at the bottom of this page.
Don’t call the dogcatcher to fix a leaky pipe, don’t call an ambulance to tow your car, and don’t yell “Fire!” when you’re attacked by a criminal. Instead, yell “Help! Police!”
(However, sounding a false fire alarm to deter a criminal might be effective in certain instances – such as being chased through a hotel hallway. Yell “Help! Police!” while pounding on suite doors as you pass, and pull a fire alarm lever – make as much noise as possible. Then hope that bystanders take action.)
Ultimately, though, your first line-of-defense should not be the wildly
unpredictable availability of helpful bystanders or police to
rescue you. You must rescue yourself! Think about it, when seconds count – cops are minutes away! The average response time to 9-1-1 emergency calls in the U.S. is ELEVEN minutes (including rural areas). That's an eternity in a crisis....
Now, if Kitty Genovese had had the chance to read what you’re about to learn, she might have escaped virtually unscathed. But, alas, Crime-Safety-Security.com didn’t exist back then. Modern “noisemaker” personal alarms didn’t exist yet either [though an old-fashioned whistle is quite effective – if it's attached to your neck by a rather weak beaded-metal chain instead of a cord that can be used to strangle you (see personal security alarms)]. Today, however, you have the following strategy – and modern tools – to possibly help you escape Kitty Genovese's fate.
Always remain aware of your surroundings (and that means no earbuds). If anyone suspicious begins to come near you, stand tall, have one hand poised on your noisemaker, raise your other hand in a “STOP!” gesture (or aiming pepper spray), and yell, "STAY AWAY FROM ME!"
If he continues coming toward you – that's your tip-off that he's probably a predator – so you can use your pepper spray and then activate your noisemaker while fleeing.
"Fight or flight” are the most well-known options. Martial arts' strategies usually add 'surrender' to the list. I’ve added two more: posturing and outsmarting, and aligned all five with FBI guidelines (and clarified their painfully clunky wording).
1. Posturing – presenting yourself as a tough target. If that fails:
2. Fleeing – and if that’s not possible:
3. Outsmarting – talking your way out and/or maneuvering toward escape. If that fails:
4. Surrendering and hoping for the best; or preferably as a setup for a sneaky escape, perhaps helped by:
5. Fighting like a mad dog to allow your escape. Stun & run.
(click on the above links for full explanations)
In the end, though, Kitty Genovese’s tragic fate ultimately helped lead you to a greater understanding of the dynamics and options within an all too common nightmare: a victim facing an attacker. Now you know how to possibly rescue yourself.
Kitty Genovese’s brother, Bill Genovese, has extensively investigated her murder and in his recent documentary ‘The Witness,’ claimed that a newspaper editor, shortly before he died in 2006, admitted to him that he had lied and greatly exaggerated the bystander apathy issue in order to sell more papers.
Actually, the police had ignored an emergency call, then blamed "38" neighbors of bystander apathy - though only two eye-witness/bystanders ignored the crime. On the other hand, at least three bystanders did try to help - and many more were misled by confusion and unaware of the life-and-death nature of the crime. Yet the media twisted the facts, and also started the loony fallacy of yelling "Fire!" as wise advice. See Debunking the Myth of Kitty Genovese
On the bright side, despite any devious reportage of bystander apathy, the massive publicity of Kitty Genovese’s murder did end up spawning decades of academic research that now illuminates the age-old question of bystander apathy (or bystander inhibition). So, ultimately, Kitty Genovese’s tragedy had a ‘silver lining in the cloud’ after all – it led to insights that will continue to help understand bystander/witness behavior.
Finally, to clarify the issues, ‘bystander apathy’ has indeed often been a problem throughout history and still remains a problem in many crimes today. Thus the advice above – Defend Your Space, A Victim's Five Options, and Strengthening Your Options – also remains.
(By the way, in 2016 - 52 years after Kitty Genovese’s murder - her killer Winston Mosely died in prison at age 81.)
By Michael Edward Loftus Sr at www.Crime-Safety-Security.com
All World Rights Reserved © Copyright